SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 517

S.N.PHUKAN, Y.K.SABHARWAL, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Whirlpool Of India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sabharwal, J.-Leave granted.

2. The appellant under a Production Incentive Scheme pays to its workers production incentive at the rates specified in the Scheme besides normal wages. For the purpose of calculating contributions towards Employees State Insurance Fund, the payment of production incentive by the appellant to its workers is not treated by it as wages within the meaning of the term as defined in Section 2(22) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short the Act ). The respondent-Employees State Insurance Corporation (for short the Corporation ) treating the said payment as wages issued a demand to the appellant for payment of contributions towards the Employees State Insurance Fund. This led to filing of an application under Section 75 of the Act by the appellant before Employees Insurance Court challenging the said demand. The said Court allowed the application and quashed the demand. It held that the payment was made quarterly and was not wages under the Act as it did not fall either under the first part of Section 2(22) or under third part thereof. The payment made by the appellant, it was held, did not fall under the first part of the d
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top