SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 6

A. S. ANAND, R. C. LAHOTI
Renu Gautam – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Gautam – Respondent


ORDER

The respondent is present in person. Counter has also been filed.

2. Heard.

3. Without going into the allegations made in the Transfer Petition and the rebuttal thereof made in the counter affidavit, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, it appears appropriate to us to allow this Petition.

4. We accordingly, withdraw Divorce Petition filed by the respondent being H.M.A. No.22 of 1995 titled Vinod Kumar Gautam v. Renu Gautam, which is pending in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge Faridabad from that court and transfer it to the file of the learned District Judge, Delhi who may either try the petition himself or assign it to a court of competent jurisdiction under him.

5. The learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad shall send the record of the case to the transferee Court without any delay.

6. The petitioner through her learned counsel and the respondent, who is present in person, are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Delhi on 22nd January, 2000.

7. The transferee Court shall expeditiously dispose of the Matrimonial Petition.

8. The Transfer Petition is, accordingly, allowed. No costs.

Petition allowed.

***************

Parallel Cit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top