G.B.PATTANAIK, RUMA PAL
J. R. Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Prasant Bhushan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ruma Pal, J.-The allegations in this contempt application relate to an incident which is alleged to have taken place on 30th December, 2000. According to the petition on that day, the respondents led a huge crowd and held a dharna in front of this Court and shouted abusive slogans against this Court including slogans ascribing lack of integrity and dishonesty to the Institution. This was done in the presence of the media. The petition alleges that the petitioners protested but were attacked and assaulted by the respondents who called them "brokers" of this Court. The petition goes on to state that that evening at 6.00 P.M. while the petitioners were watching the police officials trying to disperse the crowd, the respondents again attacked, abused and assaulted the petitioners. On the text day at 1.00 P.M. the petitioners lodged a complaint with the Tilak Marg, Police Station. A copy of the complaint has been annexed to the petition. According to the petition the dharna, slogan shouting and assault on the petitioners were designed to compel the Court to decide a pending application filed by the respondents before this Court in the respondent s favour.
2. Given the allegati
Andro Paul Terenee Ambard v. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Aswini Kumar Ghose v. Arabinda Bose
Rama Dayal Markarha v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Rustom Cawasjee Cooper v. Union of India
Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra
S.K. Sarkar v. Vinay Chandra Misra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.