SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 442

H. Seshadri – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Natarajan – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 28-9-2001 of the High Court of Karnataka in HRRP No. 783/99 whereby and whereunder a revision petition filed by the respondent No.1 herein purported to be under Section 50(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act read with Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Court Act questioning an order dated 10.6.1999 passed in miscellaneous petition No. 257/96 by the Small Causes Judge, Bangalore allowing the petition filed by the appellant herein under Order XXI Rules 99 and 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure was set aside.

3. The fact of the matter is as under:

The appellant is said to have entered into a lease agreement with the father of the first respondent in respect of the premises described in the Schedule of the original application which comprises of one shop in a portion of the residential building bearing No. 297, 11th Cross, Wilson Garden, Bangalore. The appellant is said to have been running a tailoring shop in the said premises under the name and style Rajalakshmi Tailoring Hall . According to the appellant, the residential portion of the said building was in occupation of the second respondent. An e




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top