RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
M. S. Madhusoodhanan – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Kaumudi Private LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
Ruma Pal, J.—An internecine dispute between the members of a family relating to the controlling interests in companies has given rise to the nine appeals which are being disposed of by this judgment. Given the number and nature of the proceedings, to avoid any confusion, the parties are referred to by their names and not in the capacity in which they have sued or been sued except when describing the collective stand of all the respondents in these appeals, when they are referred to simply as ‘the respondents’.
2. The main protagonists in all the litigations are Madhusoodhanan, Srinivasan, Ravi and Mani who are brothers, with Madhusoodhanan on one side and Srinivasan, Ravi and Mani on the other. The parents of the four were one K. Sukumaran and Madhavi both of whom are deceased. K. Sukumaran died before the litigations between the parties erupted and Madhavi died during the pendency of the litigation. While she was alive she supported Srinivasan, Ravi and Mani. The four brothers are married and have children. It is unnecessary at this stage to clutter and narration of facts with the names of the wives and children, who will be referred to by name when the particular litigat
Izhar Ahmad v. Union of India, AIR (1962) SC 1052
M/s. Sodhi Transport Co. v. State of U.P., AIR (1986) SC 1099
Syed Akbar v. State of Karnataka
State of Madras v. Vaidyanatha
V.B. Rangaraj v. B. Gopalakrishnan
The Bank of India Ltd. v. J.A.H. Chinoy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.