SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 105

2004(1) Supreme 1082
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Kerala High Court)
V.N. Khare, CJI., S.B. Sinha & S.H. Kapadia, JJ.
State of Kerala & Anr. -Appellants
versus
Chandramohanan -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 240 of 1997
Decided on 28-1-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Ramesh Babu M.R., Advocate.
For the Respondent : Rajiv Sakdhar, Ms. Prashanthi Prasad, K.T.S. Lekha, Manoj Prasad, Advocates.
For the Intervenor : Mathai Paikadey, Sr. Advocate, Siby Sebastian, M.T. George, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Although it cannot be held that merely by change of religion person ceases to be a member of scheduled tribe, but the question as to whether he ceases to be a member thereof or not must be determined by the appropriate Court as such question would depend upon the facts of each case.

Headnote:Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989-Section 3(i)(xi)-Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 509-Complaint filed against respondent for taking a minor girl to class room in a school with an intent to dishonour and outrage her modesty-Petition filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing charges alleging that since parents of victim have embraced Christianity, the victim ceased to be a member of Scheduled Tribe-Victim s family converted to Christianity two centuries back-Mother of victim belongs to Roman Catholic-To marry her victim s father became a Roman Catholic-Whether the family continued to be a member of Scheduled Tribe or not-Such a question can be gone into only during trial-Case remitted to Sessions Court to proceed in accordance with law-Constitution of India-Articles 341 and 342.

       Held : Even if the members of the tribe belong to different religion, the rites conducted during marriage may be different but in other respects namely inheritance, succession, etc. they may be following the same traits. (See Tribal Life of North-Eastern India by S.T. Das). In this case the matter may be considered from another angle. According to the respondents, the victim s family were converted to Christianity two centuries back. The mother of the victim belongs to Roman Catholic. Under the Customs of Roman Catholic, Catholic women can marry only a Catholic wherefor it is also necessary for the groom to convert himself as a Roman Catholic and such conversion has taken place and the father of the victim is now a member of the Roman Catholic. It has been alleged that the family of the victim has ceased to be members of the notified Tribe. (Paras 10 and 11)

       We, therefore, are of the opinion that although as a broad proposition of law it cannot be accepted that merely by change of religion person ceases to be a member of scheduled tribe, but the question as to whether he ceases to be a member thereof or not must be determined by the appropriate court as such a question would depend upon the fact of each case. In such a situation, it has to be established that a person who has embraced another religion is still suffering from social disability and also following the customs and tradition of the community, which he earlier belonged to. Under such circumstances, we set aside the order under appeal and remit the same to the Sessions Court, Palakkad, to proceed in accordance with law. (Para 19)

       

ORDER

One Ramachandran, who was the President of the Pattambi Congress Mandlam, lodged a complaint against the respondent alleging that on 24th October, 1992, the respondent at 3.30 p.m. took one eight year old girl named Elizabeth P. Kora to the class room in the Patambi Government U.P. School, with an intent to dishonour and outrage her modesty. On 11th November, 1992, the said complaint was treated as a First Information Report under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently on 21st November, 1992, the Investigating Officer came to know that the father of the victim belonged to the Mala Aryan Community, which is considered to be a Scheduled Tribe in the State of Kerala and lodged another First Information Report, charging the respondent under Section 3(i)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). On the basis of the said First Information Reports, the Chief Judicial Magistrate summoned the respondent taking cognizance against him under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Act as well as under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code. Aggrieved, the respondent filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for quashing the charges framed under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Act. The High Court was of the view that since the victim s parents have embraced Christianity, therefore, the victim ceased to be a member of the Scheduled Tribe. On this premise, the High Court quashed the charges framed against the respondent under Section 3(1)(xi) of the Act. It is against the said judgment, the State of Kerala has preferred this appeal by way of special leave petition.

2. When the matter came up before a Bench of two learned Judges, they were of the view that this matter should be heard by a larger Bench. It is by this way, the matter has come up before us.

3. The question which has been raised at the Bar is not free from doubt. The Constitution provides for declaration of certain castes and tribes as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in terms of Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India. Article 342 reads as under:

"342. Scheduled Tribes:-(1) The President may with respect to any State or Union Territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the tribes or tribal communities or parts or or groups within tribes or tribal communities which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State or Union territory, as the case may be.

(2) Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in a notification issued under clause (1) any tribe or tribal community or part of or group within any tribe or tribal community, but save as aforesaid a notification issued under the said clause shall not be varied by any subsequent notification."

4. The object of the said provision is to provide right for the purpose of grant of protection to the Scheduled Tribes having regard to the economic and educationally backwardness wherefrom they suffer. For the aforementioned purpose only the President of India has been authorised to issue the notification to parts or groups within the Tribes. It is not in dispute that the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 made in terms of the aforementioned provisions is exhaustive. The question which is required to be posed at the outset is what is the Tribes.

"Tribe has been defined as a social group of a simple kind, the members of which speak common dilect, have a single government and act together for such common purposes as warfare. Other typical characteristics include a common name, a contiguous territory, a relatively uniform culture or way of life and a tradition of common descent. Tribes are usually composed of a number of local communities e.g. bands, villages or neighbourhoods and are often aggregated in clusters of a higher order called nations. The term is


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top