2004(1) Supreme 78
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
V.N. Khare, CJI., D.M. Dharmadhikari & S.B. Sinha, JJ.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. -Petitioner
versus
Ram Kali & Ors. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9065 of 2003
Decided on 5-1-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Parmanand Gaur, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
This Special Leave Petition is directed against a judgment and order dated 20th December, 2002 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby and whereunder the appeal filed by the petitioner herein questioning an award dated 6.9.2002 made by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fatehabad was dismissed. The High Court has dismissed the aforementioned appeal inter alia on the ground that the driving licence of the offending vehicle had been found to be fake. The learned Tribunal, however, arrived at the finding of fact that the first respondent herein has violated the terms and conditions of the insurance policy by plying the Maruti Van on hire/reward at the time of accident.
The said question, it appears from the impugned judgment of the High Court, was not adverted to before it.
In view of the fact that both the Tribunal and the High Court had exercised their discretion in favour of the claimant, we do not intend to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. No costs.
Appeal dismissed.
****************
00020
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.