SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 621

G. P. MATHUR
Pune Municipal Corporation And Anothe Pune Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Promoters And Builders Association – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, CJI-Whether the impugned amendment to the Development Control Rules (DCR) sanctioned by the State Government of Maharashtra is in accordance with the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (the Act) is the matter for consideration herein.

2. The Act inter alia constituted Regional Development Authorities to streamline the development planning of Greater Bombay and Pune. Respective Corporations of Bombay and Pune were nominated as Regional Development Authorities under the Act. On 8.7.1993 the Maharashtra Government issued a directive under section 37 of the Act to Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to amend its DCR in the line of Bombay DCR. On 30.9.1993 PMC published the proposed amendments in the Official Gazette and invited objections/suggestions in accordance with section 37(1) of the Act. Subsequently the State Government sanctioned the proposed amendments. On 22.8.1995 the PMC submitted a proposal for modification of the DCR without any modification in the draft regulations. Thereafter, the State Government vide Notification dated 5.6.1997 under section 37(2) of the Act sanctioned the proposal of the modification and notified th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top