P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, G. P. MATHUR
Shyam Sundar Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Pannalal Jaiswal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.-Respondent No. 1 herein filed Title Suit No. 89 of 1992 on the file of the Munsif s Court at Howrah against the appellant and others for a declaration of his title as a Thika Tenant in respect of the plaint A schedule property and for other consequential reliefs. The appellant herein- defendant No. 1 in the suit, entered appearance and contested the suit and the application for interim injunction filed by the plaintiff. The application for interim injunction was heard and the same was dismissed by the trial Court. The plaintiff filed an appeal against that order under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "the Code") and that appeal was also dismissed by the District Judge on 16.3.1994.
2. The suit itself stood posted to 8.10.1996. The appellant - the first defendant, did not appear. The evidence of the plaintiff was recorded. On 9.10.1996 the plaintiff filed two applications - one for an amendment of the plaint and the other for certain corrections in the plaint. Those applications were allowed the same day in the absence of any opposition. In view of his absence, the first defendant, the appellant, was set ex parte and
Sheodan Singh v. Daryao Kunwar
Board of Revenve v. M/s. Raj Brothers Agencies Etc.
Ratansingh v. Vijaysingh & Ors.
Rani Choudhury v. Lt. -Col. Suraj Jit Choudhury
Essar Constructions v. N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy
P. Kiran Kumar v. A.S. Khadar & Ors.
Raja Kulkarni & Ors. v. The State of Bombay
Messrs Mela Ram & Sons v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.