SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1396

G. P. MATHUR
Sompal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Rathi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.P. Mathur, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred by the complainant, Sompal Singh (first informant) against the judgment and order dated 27.5.2004 of Allahabad High Court by which Sunil Rathi (respondent No.1) has been granted bail in a case under Section 147/148/149/302/307/404/504 and 506 IPC.

3. Sunil Rathi had been initially granted bail by the High Court on 30.5.2003. This order was challenged by the complainant Sompal Singh by filing Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2551 of 2003. The appeal was disposed of by this Court on 6.1.2004 and the relevant portion of the order is being reproduced below:

"Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the disposal of the prayer for bail cannot be termed satisfactory. At least three flaws are apparent: (i) The fact that the accused is named in the F.I.R., (ii) the fact that the accused had several other accusations to his credit; and (iii) the fact that the co-accused was denied bail, have not received consideration at the hands of the High Court."

The order dated 30.5.2003 was accordingly set aside and the bail application filed by respondent No.1 was directed to be cons





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top