SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(SC) 57

M. PATANJALI SASTRI, S. R. DASS, H. J. KANIA
Pannalal Jankidas – Appellant
Versus
Mohanlal – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, I.M.SHROFF, M.C.SETALVAD, MOHAN BEHARI LAL, RAJESWAR NATH NIGAM, RAMA DATTA, RANG BEHARI LAL

Judgment

Kania, C.J.I.(On behalf of himself and Das J.)-This is an appeal from a judgment of the H. C. at Bombay. Although the record is heavy & many points were argued in the trial Ct. & in the Ct. of appeal at Bombay, the important point argued before us in only one.

2. The applts. (pltfs.) area firm of commission agents in Bombay. The resps. (defts.) were their constituents. Accounts between the parties in respect of their dealings were made up & settled upto 30-10-1943. Piecegoods & yarn continued to be purchased & consigned by the pltfs. to the defts. joint family firm thereafter. One bale of piecegoods was purchased & despatched in Nov. 1943. In Jan. 1944 restrictions were imposed against the consignment of piecegoods and/or yarn outside Bombay by rail without obtaining the necessary previous permit from the Textile Commr. at Bombay. On or about 6-2-1944 Mohanlal of the defts joint family firm came to Bombay & the plfts. purchased on their behalf 278 bales of piecegoods. Ninety-four out of those were desptached according to the defts. instructions. The plfts. according to the defts. instructions, applied for & obtained permit to consign several more bales. On the permits b


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top