SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 117

B. K. MUKHERJEE, GHULAM HASAN, M. C. MAHAJAN, N. H. BHAGWATI, S. R. DASS, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE, B. JAGANNATHA DAS
Behram Khurshid Pesikaka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
B.M.MISTRY, GANAPATHY IYER, J.B.DADACHAN, M.C.SETALVAD, P.G.COKHALE, PARAS A.MEHTA, R.D.CHADHA, R.H.Dhebar, RAJENDER NARAIN

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The appellant was acquitted by the Presidency Magistrate of charges under Section 66(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 338 IPC but convicted by the High Court under Section 66(b) (!) (!) (!) . - The doctor found the appellant's breath smelling of alcohol but opined he was not under its influence, having taken alcohol in some form (!) . - The appellant claimed he consumed B.G. Phos, a medicinal tonic containing 17% alcohol, after dinner on the night of the accident (!) (!) (!) . - In Balsara's case, the Supreme Court declared Section 13(b) invalid only insofar as it prohibited consumption of liquid medicinal or toilet preparations containing alcohol (!) (!) (!) . - The High Court placed the burden on the accused to prove consumption of permitted medicinal alcohol under Section 105/106 Evidence Act, following its prior decision (!) (!) (!) . - A three-judge bench split on burden of proof, leading to reference under Article 145(3) to a Constitution Bench on the effect of the Balsara declaration (!) (!) (!) . - The Constitution Bench (majority) held the declaration renders the relevant part of Section 13(b) inoperative and unenforceable against citizens; prosecution must prove consumption of prohibited liquor (!) (!) (!) . - Doctrine of waiver does not apply to fundamental rights; American views on statutes affecting only parties do not apply due to Article 141 (!) (!) . - No exception or proviso is engrafted onto Section 13(b); courts cannot rewrite statutes (!) (!) . - Final outcome: prosecution failed to prove prohibited liquor was consumed; conviction quashed (!) (!) .

What is the effect of the declaration in State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara that Clause (b) of Section 13 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, is void under Article 13(1) of the Constitution in so far as it affects the consumption or use of liquid medicinal or toilet preparations containing alcohol? [p_139][p_144]


Judgement

BHAGWATI J.: This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay reversing the order of acquittal passed in favour of the Appellant by the Court of the Presidency Magistrate 19th Court, Bombay and convicting him of an offence under Section 66(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and sentencing him to one month s rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-

2. The Appellant who was the Officiating Regional Transport Officer, Bombay Region was on the 29th May 1951 at about 9.30 P. M. proceeding in his jeep car towards the Colaba Bus Stand when he knocked down three persons, Mrs. Savitribai Motwani, her husband and Miss Parvatibai Abhichandani.

The police arrested the Appellant and took him to the police station. From the police station he was taken to St. George s Hospital in order to be examined by the doctor for alleged consumption of liquor. The doctor found his breath smelling of alcohol. He however found that the conjunctive were congested, the pupils were semi-dilated and reacting to light. The speech was coherent & he could behave himself and walk along a straight fine. The doctor was therefore of opinion that he did not seem


















































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top