SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(SC) 136

B.K.MUKHERJEE, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, VIVIAN BOSE
Mahendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Vidyavati – Respondent


Advocates:
C.P.LAL, G.C.MATHUR, N.C.CHATTERJI, S.K.KAPOOR, Veda Vyasa

Judgement

VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J. : This is an appeal by special leave against the decision of the Election Tribunal, Nowgong, setting aside the election of the appellant to the Legislative Assembly, Vindhya Pradesh, from Laundi. Constituency, on the ground firstly that he had employed Government servants as polling agents, and thereby committed a major corrupt practice under S. 123(8) of Act 43 of 1951, and secondly, that there were at the material period, contracts subsisting between the appellant and the Vindhya Pradesh Government for printing electoral rolls, and that he was therefore, disqualified under S. 17 of Act 49 of 1951.

2. As regards the first point, we have held in - Satya Dev Busheri v. Padam Dev , AIR 1954 SC 587 (A) and in - Satya Dev Busheri v. Padam Dev, (S) AIR 1955 SC 5 (B) that the appointment of a Government servant as polling agent does not per se fall within the mischief of S. 123(8). Mr. Chatterjee for the respondent referred us to the evidence of P. W. 5 which, if accepted, would show that the polling agent did also canvassing work for the appellant.

If this evidence is to be accepted, then there was undoubtedly corrupt practice falling within S. 123(8). But








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top