SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
30th March, 1960
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. WANCHOO AND K.C. DAS GUPTA, JJ.
M/s. Burn and Co., Ltd., Howrah Iron Works; Howrah, Appellants
Versus
Their Employees and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 195 and 196 of 1959.
Advocates Appeared
Mr. B. Sen, Senior Advocate, (M/s. P. K. Chakravarty and B. N. Ghosh, Advocates, with him), for Appellants (in No. 195 of 59) and Respondents (in No. 196 of 59); Mr. N. C. Chatterjee, Senior Advocate, (M/s. D. L. Sen Gupta, and B. P. Maheswari, Advocates, with him), for Respondents (in No. 195 of 59) and Appellants (in No. 196 of 59).
INCENTIVE BONUS - CLERICAL AND SUBORDINATE STAFF - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947, S. 10(1) - The court held that the clerical and subordinate staff are also entitled to incentive bonus, even though they do not directly produce goods, as they contribute to the production process and other comparable concerns provide such bonus.
Fact of the Case:
The company introduced incentive bonus for manual workers but excluded clerical and subordinate staff. The workmen claimed that these categories should also be given incentive bonus. The company resisted the claim on the grounds that the clerical staff got higher dearness allowance and that they did not directly produce goods.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the exclusion of clerical and subordinate staff from the incentive bonus scheme was not justified, as they also contributed to the production process and other comparable concerns provided such bonus. It also held that the fact that the clerical staff got higher dearness allowance was not a reason to deprive them of the incentive bonus.
Issues: Whether the clerical and subordinate staff are entitled to incentive bonus.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the clerical and subordinate staff are also entitled to incentive bonus, even though they do not directly produce goods, as they contribute to the production process and other comparable concerns provide such bonus.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the company's appeal and upheld the tribunal's order extending the incentive bonus scheme to the clerical and subordinate staff.
Judgment
WANCHOO, J.: These are two appeals by special leave against the same award of the Third Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and shall be disposed of by this judgment. Appeal No. 195 is by Messrs. Burn and Company Limited (hereinafter called the company) and Appeal No. 196 is by the workmen of Messrs. Burn and Company Limited (hereinafter called the workmen). There were disputes between the company and the workmen on various matters, which were referred to the tribunal for adjudication. Of these disputes, only two now survive in the two appeals. The company s appeal is with respect to that part of the award which deals with incentive bonus to the clerical and subordinate staff while the workmen s appeal is with respect to that part of the award which deals with the cash benefit of Annas eight per head per working day for the period the canteen was not in operation.
2. We shall first take up the company s appeal. The company has introduced incentive bonus for manual workers including Sarkars and checkers but there is no provision for incentive bonus to the clerical and subordinate staff. The workmen therefore claimed that these two categories should also be given incentive bonus like the manual workers and pointed out that in other concerns this was done. The company resisted the claim on two grounds (i) that the clerical staff got what is known as the Bengal Chamber of Commerce dearness allowance, which is higher than the dearness allowance paid to the manual workers and (ii) that the clerical staff and the subordinate staff do not actually produce anything and if they are given incentive bonus it will mean that they would be paid on the production of others, namely, the manual workers.
3. The tribunal was of the view that the face that the clerks got the Bengal Chamber of Commerce dearness allowance was no reason for their total exclusion from the benefit of the incentive bonus scheme. It also pointed out that the subordinate staff did not get the Bengal Chamber of Commerce dearness allowance and there was no difference between their dearness allowance and the dearness allowance of the manual workers. Further the tribunal was conscious of the fact that the clerical staff and the subordinate staff do not directly produce goods but that in its opinion was no justification for their total exclusion, particularly when other comparable concerns like the Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited at Burnpur, Bridge and Roof Company (India) Limited, Howrah and Tatas were paying incentive bonus to the clerical and subordinate staff also. It therefore ordered that the company should extend the scheme of incentive bonus to the clerical and subordinate staff also and lay down the rates and conditions for the same.
4. The main contention of the company before us is that as the clerical staff and the subordinate staff have no part in actual production they should not be given any incentive bonus, particularly as their work does not increase at all because of the increased production. It is, however, difficult to accept that there will be no increase in the work of the clerical staff in particular and also of the subordinate staff because of higher production, though it may be accepted that the increase may not be in proportion to the increase of production. It is also true that the clerical staff and the subordinate staff do not directly produce goods like manual workers and that may be a reason for treating them somewhat differently in the matter of incentive bonus and that is what the tribunal seems to have done, for it has directed the company to extend the scheme of incentive bonus to the clerical and subordinate staff and to lay down the rates and conditions of the same and has not said that exactly the same rates and conditions should apply to the clerical and subordinate staff as apply to the manual workers. But there can be no doubt that economically speaking the clerical staff and the subordinate staff also take part in the productio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.