SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(SC) 349

K.N.WANCHOO, P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR
Lord Krishna Sugar Mills – Appellant
Versus
Its Workmen – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, G.C.MATHUR, M.C.SETALVAD

Judgment

GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. : Three applications made by the appellant, the Lord Krishna Textile Mills, under S. 6-E (2)(b) of the United Provinces Industrial Disputes; Act, 1947 (Act XXVIII of 1947), for obtaining the approval of the Industrial Tribunal to the dismissal of 8 of its workmen have been rejected; and the Tribunal has refused to accord its approval to the action taken by the appellant. This appeal by special leave challenges the legality, validity as well as the propriety of the said order, and the principal question which it seeks to raise is in regard to the scope of the enquiry permissible under S. 6E (2)(b) as well as the extent of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in holding such an enquiry. Section 6E(2) of the U. P. Act is identical in terms with S. 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, XIV of 1947 (hereafter called the Act), and for convenience we would refer to the latter section because what we decide in the present appeal will apply as much to cases falling under S. 6E (2)(b) of the U. P. Act as those falling under S. 33(2)(b) of the Act.

2. It appears that on October 12, 1957, when the appellant s Controller of Production and the General Superintendent were discu

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top