T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S.R.DASS, J.L.KAPUR, J.C.SHAH, M.HIDAYATULLAH
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, U. P – Respondent
Judgment
S. K. DAS, J. : One Ranjit Singh is the petitioner before us. The respondents are the Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow, the Incometax Officer, Lucknow, and the Collectors of three districts in Uttar Pradesh, namely, Dehra Dun, Kanpur and Lucknow, being officers under whose orders certain properties of the petitioner and his family have been attached in pursuance of a notice of demand issued under S. 29 of the Indian Incometax Act, 1922, in circumstances which we shall presently state.
2. The facts are shortly these. In 1948, the Central Government referred a number of cases in which the petitioner was concerned to the Income-tax Investigation Commission set up under the relevant provisions of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947 (Act XXX of 1947), hereinafter referred to as the Act. On May 30, 1948, the Secretary of the Commission issued a notice to the petitioner to furnish a list of businesses or concerns in which the petitioner was interested and to produce the account books, registers etc., relating thereto. The petitioner complied with the notice. Then, an Authorised Official appointed by the Commission commenced an investigation into the cases
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.