SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 125

K.SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.L.KAPUR, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Sao – Respondent


Advocates:
P.D.MENON, S.P.Varma

Judgment

SUBBA RAO, J. : This appeal by special leave against the, judgment and order of the High Court at Patna raises the question, whether - to use neutral terms - the keeping or using of a radio set by a person without a licence would be an offence under S. 20 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (13 of 1885), hereinafter called the Act.

2. The respondent is a businessman, having a shop in the city of Patna. In November 1955 an inspector of Wireless Telegraph visited his shop and found a radio set being played therein. As he was using the radio without a licence he was prosecuted under Ss. 3 and 6 of the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 (17 of 1933) and S. 20 of the Act. The Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, convicted the respondent under the said sections and sentenced him only under S. 20 of the Act to pay a fine of Rs. 200 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge, Patna confirmed both the conviction and sentence on revision, the High Court at Patna set aside the conviction and sentence under S. 20 of the Act, but confirmed the conviction under Ss. 3 and 6 of the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 and sentenced him t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top