SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(SC) 64

J. C. SHAH, R. S. BACHAWAT, K. SUBBA RAO
Rangubai Kom Sankar Jagtap – Appellant
Versus
Sunderabai Bhratar Sakharam Jedhes – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, NAUNIT LAL, S.G.PATVARDHAN

JUDGMENT

Subba Rao, J.

These are two applications, one for the substitution of the legal representatives of respondent No. 7 in Civil Appeal No. 430 of 1963 on the file of this Court and the other for the condonation of delay in filing the first application.

2. The first question is whether there is sufficient ground for excusing the delay in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of the 7th respondent on record. The facts are as follows : Sakharam Maruti Jedhe and others filed Special Suit No. 10 of 1964 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Poona, against Rangubai Kom Shanker Jagtap for possession of the plaint-schedule property and for mesne profits and obtained a decree therein. Against the said decree defendant preferred an appeal to the High Court of Bombay. The High Court by its judgment dated April 8, 1959, dismissed the appeal. The defendant filed an application for special leave to prefer an appeal to this Court and the same was granted on June 16, 1959. The appeal was admitted on July 27, 1961. Between these two dates, on November 12, 1959, the 7th respondent, Keshavarao Marutirao Jedhe died. Thereafter, on March 7, 1964, the defendant fil


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top