R.S.BACHAWAT, M.HIDAYATULLAH, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.M.SHELAT, K.SUBBA RAO
Inder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
SHELAT, J. : The appellants are members of a Hindu undivided family of which the first appellant is the Karta. Prior to August 21, 1956 the family owned 64.35 standard acres of land in village Kurali, District Patiala. The land stood in the revenue records in the name of the first appellant. On December 23, 1957, the first appellant transferred 26 standard acres to one Babu Singh by a registered deed. According to them, they had planted an orchard in 10 acres of land. Their contention was that the said 26 standard acres and the said 10 standard acres could not be taken into account while ascertaining surplus land under the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 13 of 1955. Both these claims were rejected by the authorities. By his order dated January 20, 1961, respondent No. 3 declared 34.35 standard acres out of the said 64.35 standard acres as surplus land. The appeal filed by the appellants against the said order was rejected. They then filed a revision application before respondent No. 1. While that was pending they filed a writ petition in the High Court. During the pendency of that writ petition, the Punjab legislature passed the Amendment Act, 16 of 1962 inserting
Referred : Pritam Singh v State of Punjab
I. C. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab
Banarsi Das v. Wealth-tax Officer Spl. Circle, Meerut
K. K. Kochuni v. State of Madras and Kerala
Referred to : Inder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others
Distinguished : Inder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.