K. C. DAS GUPTA, K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR
Ranjit Singh, Major (Now Lt. Col. ) Micheal A. R. Skinner – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
HIDAYATULLAH, J.:
This judgment will dispose of Civil Appeal No. 743 of 1963 and Civil Appeals Nos. 553 and 554 of 1962. The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 743 of 1963 are owners of lands in village Virk Kalan, Tehsil and District Bhatinda. The appellants in the other appeals are owners of lands in villages Sewana and Mehnd of Tehsil Hansi in District Hissar. Proceedings for the consolidation of holdings are going on in these villages under the East Punjab Holdings (Conservation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act 1948 (Act 30 of 1948). This Act was amended on many occasions but we are concerned with it as amended by the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) (2nd Amendment and Validation) Act 1960 (27 of 1960). In the present consolidation proceedings portions of lands from those commonly owned by the appellants as proprietors, have been reserved for the village Panchayat and given over to it for diverse purposes, and other portions have been reserved either for non-proprietors or for the common purposes of the villages. Without going into too much detail it is sufficient to indicate that in village Virk Kalan 270 kanals and 13 marlas have bee
referred : Raghubir Singh v. Court of Wards, Ajmer and another
Ram Narain Medhi v. State of Bombay
K. K. Kochuni v. State of Madras
Gangadhar Narayanrao v. State of Bombay
Burrakur Coal Co., Ltd. v. Union of India
State of Bihar v. Rameshwar Pratap Narain Singh
Sonapur Tea Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commr. and Collector of Kamrup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.