SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 237

K.S.HEGDE, R.S.BACHAWAT, S.M.SIKRI
Chockalinga Sethurayar – Appellant
Versus
Arumanayakain – Respondent


Advocates:
G.L.SANGHI, R.THIAGARAJAN

Judgment

HEGDE, J.: This appeal by certificate is directed against the decision of the High Court of Madras in A. S. No. 276 of 1955. The question that aries for decision herein is whether the appellants or the respondent should be held to be the trustees of the suit trust. The Trial Court upheld the claim of the appellants whereas the High Court in appeal came to the conclusion that the trusteeship has devolved on the respondent.

2. For the purpose of deciding the controversy before us it is not necessary to refer to the various facts that were placed before the Trial Court or the High Court. The facts material for our present purpose are these:

3. One Rangayya Sethurayar who will hereinafter be referred to as Rangayya 1 was a well to do person. He died in the year 1886 leaving behind him his wife Karuthammal. He had no issues but he was bringing up his brother s son Dharmalinga Sethurayar as his foster son. He executed a will on June 25, 1884 (Exh. A-1) under which be constituted a trust in respect of some of his properties for the purpose of carrying on the water supply charity and Dwadesi Kattalai charity in the choultry built by him. Under the said will he constituted Dharmalinga











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top