SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 208

I.D.DUA, J.M.SHELAT
Rajpal Slngh – Appellant
Versus
Jai Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the petitioner(s):Mr. Pranav Kohli, Advocate.
For the respondent(s):Mr. Rakesh Khajuria, Dy. AG and S. Meharban Singh, Advocate.

Judgment

SHELAT, J.:- This appeal, by certificate granted by the High Court of Allahabad, is against its order dismissing the criminal revision filed by the appellants and refusing to interfere with the order passed by the Sessions Judge setting aside the order of discharge passed by the committing Magistrate.

2. The facts leading to the appeal may briefly be stated. One Naubat Singh of village Nagla Shekhoo, who owned certain lands, died in August 1963. Some three years prior thereto he had sold part of his land to complainant Jai Singh who was married to Raj Kali, who, according to the prosecution, was the only heir and legal representative of the said Naubat Singh. On the death of Naubat Singh, Raj Kali entered into possession of the rest of the land as his sole heir. The appellants (the original accused), however, put up a claim that Kasturi, the wife of the appellant Sardar Singh, was also the daughter of Naubat Singh, and therefore, entitled to a half share in the property left by Naubat Singh. Legal proceedings ensued as a result of these rival claims and February 13, 1964 was the date of the hearing.

3. According to the complainant Jai Singh, at about 11.30 P. M. on that date










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top