SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 6

K. S. HEGDE, A. N. GROVER, A. N. RAY, J. C. SHAH, M. HIDAYATULLAH, I. D. DUA
Marthi Venkata Subbarao – Appellant
Versus
Kruthiventi Kutumba Rao – Respondent


Judgment

Hidayatullah, C.J.I. -The appellants were, convicted for contempt of the Court of District Munsif of Vijayavada and sentenced to two months simple imprisonment, with the direction that they may be detained in District Prison, Secunderabad. During the course of the hearing of this appeal, the appellants have submitted an unconditional apology for having obstructed that process of the court, and pray that this apology be accepted. We note that no such apology was tendered in the High Court and the question arises whether by accepting the apology we should acquit them or not. In our judgment, there is no case made out for complete exoneration from their contempt. However, in view of the fact that the other side who also agrees that the apology be accepted we accept the apology and reduce the sentence of the appellants to the period of imprisonment already undergone by them which period we are told is in the neighbourhood of ten days. The contemnors will also pay costs of the proceedings in this Court and in the High Court.

For Citation : (1971) 3 SCC (1)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top