SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 585

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, K.K.MATHEW, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Guru Nanak. Flour And Oil Mills: Behari Lal Ashu Ram: Meva Ram Ram Lal – Respondent


Judgment

VAIDIALINGAM, J.:- These three appeals by the State of Punjab, by special leave, relate to the validity of levy of sales tax on oil seeds and edible oils under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (Punjab Act XLVI of 1948) (hereinafter to be referred as the Act).

2. in all these appeals the assessee respondents challenged before the High Court either the orders of assessment proposed to be passed by the assessing authority or declining to grant refund of sales tax already collected during the relevant assessment years.

3. In Civil Appeal No. 1678 of 1969, the respondent is a partnership firm carrying on business in foodgrains, pulses, flour cotton and oil seeds, besides extracting oil from sarson (mustard). Toria etc. at Nabha. The firm is a registered dealer under the Act. In respect of the years 1961-62 and 1962-63, according to the Department, the assessee has not paid the full tax as required by Section 10 (4) of the Act, and hence proceedings were initiated for recovery of the same. The respondent filed Civil Writ No. 214 of 1965 in the Punjab High Court to issue appropriate directions to the assessing authority, not to assess the firm to sales tax in respect of the pu




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top