P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, G.K.MITTER
Narayan Dass Indurakhya – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
Judgment
MITTER, J.:- This appeal by special leave from a judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dismissing the writ petition of the appellant challenging the order of the State Government under S. 5 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act (Act XXIII of 1961) forfeiting the copies of a book published by the appellant under S. 4 (1) of the Act, can be disposed of on the short ground that the order did not disclose the grounds of the opinion formed by the State Government.
2. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) empowered the State Governments by S. 4 to make order declaring any newspaper or book as defined in the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 or any other document wherever printed, to be forfeited to the Government if it appeared to the Government that the said book etc. questioned the territorial integrity or frontiers of India in a manner which was or was likely to be prejudicial to the interests of the safety or security of India. The relevant provisions of the Act are as follows:
"Section 2. Whoever by words either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation or otherwise, questions the territorial integ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.