SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 442

H.R.KHANNA, I.D.DUA
State Of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Rao: M. D. Bajid – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J. :- These two appeals by the State of Assam (Crl. A. No. 92 of 1970 State of Assam v. Krishna Rao and Cr. A. No. 93 of 1970 State of Assam v. M. D. Bajid) under Art. 136 of the Constitution are directed against the common judgment of the Assam & Nagaland High Court dated April 30, 1969 allowing two appeals by the two respondents (Cr. A. 61 of 1968 M. D. Bajid v. State of Assam and Cr. A. 62 of 1968 V. Krishna Rao v. The State of Assam) against two separate judgments of the Special Judge, Gauhati dated June 12, 1968 in two separate trials. Though the High Court recorded a common judgment, it dealt with the two cases separately. We also propose to dispose of both the appeals by the common judgment.

2. The relevant facts giving rise to the two cases, the essential features of which are largely common, may now be stated. Accused Krishna Rao was a Garrison Engineer, M. E. S. at Jorhat and M. D. Bajid (appellant in the other case) was the Assistant Garrison Engineer under him. During the term of office of these two officers, it is alleged that Messrs Barakar Engineering and Foundry Works, Calcutta were contractors under the M.E.S., Jorhat for supplying fabricated building m


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top