SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 242

D.G.PALEKAR, A.ALAGIRISWAMI
Jugal Kishore – Appellant
Versus
Dhanno Devi (Dead) By L. Rs – Respondent


Judgment

PALEKAR, J.:- The appellant is the son and legal representative of the original defendants to the suit, Kedarnath and Chanda Devil The respondents are the legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff, Dhanno Devi

On January 2, 1948 Dhanno Devi presented an application under O. 33, Rules 2 and 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for permission to sue as a pauper in the Court of the First Civil Judge, Kanpur. The plaint part of the application prayed for the relief of possession of a house situated in the city of Kanpur on the allegation that the house was of the ownership of one Budhu Lal - her father. Budhu Lal died in 1918 and on his death his widow Jumna Devi inherited the property. On Jumna Devi s death on December 26, 1935 Dhanno Devi, as the daughter was entitled to succeed to the property. The defendants were in possession and were falsely refusing to yield up their possession to Dhanno Devi and hence she was required to file the suit. A very large amount had to be paid as court fee which Dhanno Devi was not in a position to pay and hence she prayed that permission may be given to her to sue as a pauper. The last date for filing the suit was December 26, 1947 but as


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top