SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 386

S.N.DWIVEDI, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Sukh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, D.MUKHERJI, D.P.UMYAL, E.C.AGARWAL, O.P.RANA

Judgment

DWIVEDI, J. :- Three persons, Mahendra Singh, Lakhan Singh and the appellant Sukh Ram, were tried for the murder of one Chunni Lal under S. 302 read with S. 34 I.P.C. by the Sessions Judge, Aligarh. The Sessions Judge acquitted Mahendra Singh, and convicted and sentenced the remaining two to imprisonment for life. On appeal the High Court of Allahabad acquitted Lakhan Singh and affirmed the conviction and sentence of the appellant. Hence this appeal.

2. The deceased Chunni Lal had a tea stall near the Bus Stand in Sasni. He was shot dead on 9-3-1967 at about 10.30 P.M. The First Information Report of the incident was lodged by Sundar Lal, a relation of the deceased. The prosecution examined Sundar Lal, Radhey Shyam, Puran Mal and Devi Prasad to prove its case against the aforesaid accused. The Sessions Judge believed all the witnesses. In a careful and sifting analysis of the entire evidence, the learned Judges of the High Court (S.D. Khare and Jagmohan Lal Sinha JJ.) have winnowed out all evidence which could legitimately be objected to by the appellant and have held that the remaining evidence clearly brought home the guilt to him. Counsel for the appellant could not point























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top