V.R.KRISHNA IYER, R.S.SARKARIA
Jagdish Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Judgment
KRISHNA IYER, J. :- The petitioner detained by the order of the District Magistrate for anti-social proclivity prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community challenges its validity in this petition for habeas corpus.
2. Mr. Frank Anthony has vigorously urged two vital defects as vitiating the detention order incarcerating the petitioner, based mainly on the unreported ruling of this Court in Prabhu Dayal v. District Magistrate, Kamrup W. P. No. 1496 of 1973 D/- 11-10-1973 the wellknown Lohia case (1960) Cri LJ 1002) and a few other peripheral observations in other decisions. The District Magistrate was uncertain whether he would detain the petitioner to prevent disruption of maintenance of supplies or of services essential to the life of the community and such a mindless order suffered from a fatal genetic disease diagnosed by this Court in many decisions as fatal, runs the submission.
3. Now, the admitted facts and the authoritative law and their interaction. It is best to begin with the impugned order itself which reads :
"No 1182/C dated, the 9th October, 1973 whereas I am satisfied that with a view to preventing Shri Jagdish Prasad. Pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.