SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD AND P.N. BHAGWATI, JJ.
Mehtab Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
The State of M.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 1971, D/-19-11-1974.
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 read with Sections 147 and 149 - Special leave – Acquitted - Criminal Appeal - Post-mortem examination - Prosecution case was that at about in evening (P- W- 4) (P- W- 11) and some other were sitting on a slightly raised ground in front of hut when all twenty-three accused including appellants came from direction of temple and Than started abusing and shouted let us finally settle score (P.W.1) who belonged to faction of and was sitting there with and others entreated accused with folded hands but that had no effect Than and others started pelting stones at (P- W- 11) was injured by one of stones pelted by – In meantime accused picked up sticks and from hut for attacking and on seeing this ran to their houses took shelter in a room in hut of wife of locked room from outside - Held, Case of however stands on a different footing - Not a single eyewitness stated that exhorted other accused to beat and only two of eye-witnesses - But this statement (P. W. 1) and (P. W. 2) was rejected by Sessions Court and rightly so because there was no of injuries received by (P. W.1) nor R.C who examined all who were sent to him for medical examination immediately after incident give any report or state in his evidence that (P. W.1) had received any injuries High Court however totally ignored this circumstance and held that was a member of unlawful assembly which developed common object of killing – Court do not find in judgment of High Court any discussion of substantial reasons given by Sessions Court for not accepting testimony of eye-witnesses in regard to view taken by Sessions Court was in any event a reasonably possible view of evidence in so far as case against is concerned - Court are therefore of view that High Court was in error in reversing acquittal and appeal in so far as it relates to him must succeed - Order accordingly
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J.:- This appeal, by special leave, arises out of a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Twenty-three persons were prosecuted in the Court of the Third Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal on various charges under Section 147 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Out of these twenty-three persons, seventeen, including Than Singh and Bhawani, were acquitted by the Sessions Court, of the remaining six Pyare was convicted under Sections 302 and 147 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life for the former offence and two years rigorous imprisonment for the latter, both sentences being directed to run concurrently. The remaining five, namely, Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhram, Maniram and Nandram were found guilty only under S. 147 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years. Being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence, Pyare, Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhram, Maniram and Nandram preferred Criminal Appeal No. 672 of 1967 anal the State of Madhya Pradesh also preferred Criminal Appeal No. 777 of 1967 against the acquittal of Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhram, Maniram and Nandram under Section 302 read with Section 149 and the acquittal of Than Singh and Bhawani under Section 147 as well as Section 302 read with Section 149. The appeal of Pyare was partly allowed and his conviction was altered to one under Section 304, Part II and sentence reduced to a term of seven years rigorous imprisonment, while the appeal of the other accused was rejected. The appeal of the State was accepted and Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhram, Maniram, Nandram, Than Singh and Bhawani were convicted under Section 147 and Section 304, Part II read with Section 149 and while maintaining the sentence under Section 147, the High Court directed that Mehtab Singh should be sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years, while each of the other accused should suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years. Pyare accepted the judgment of the High Court, but Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Sukhram, Maniram, Nandram, Than Singh and Bhawani preferred the present appeal with special leaves obtained from this Court
2. The incident out of which the present appeal arises took place in the evening at about 6 p. m. on 27th March, 1967 in a village called Khajuri Kalan in the State of Madhya Pradesh. That day was the second day after Holi-what the witnesses have called Dooj of Holi. There were admittedly two factions in this village, one of Thakurs led by Mehtab Singh and the other of Chamars led by Ram Singh and there was animosity between these two factions. The prosecution case was that at about 6 p. m. in the evening Halku, Nanoo (P. W. 4), Misri (P. W. 11), Somat and some other chamars were sitting on a slightly raised ground in front of Halku s hut when all the twenty-three accused, including the appellants, came from the direction of the temple. Mehtab Singh and Than Singh started abusing the Chamars and shouted "Chamars, let us finally settle the score". Mithulal (P. W. 1), who belonged to the faction of the Chamars and was sitting there with Halku and others, entreated the accused with folded hands but that had no effect and Mehtab Singh, Than Singh and others started pelting stones at the Chamars. Misri (P. W. 11) was injured by one of the stones pelted by Mehtab Singh. In the meantime, the accused picked up sticks and farsas from the hut of Jagannath for attacking the Chamars and on seeing this the Chamars ran to their houses. Halku, Nanoo and Mithulal took shelter in a room in the hut of Halku and Prembai wife of Halku locked the room from outside. Mehtab Singh, Ram Singh, Pyare and some of the other accused, however, broke open the lock and Ram Singh, Pyare, Sukhram, Maniram and Nandram entered the room and dragged out Halku, Nanoo (P. W. 4) and Mithulal (P. W. 1). The other accused were at that time standing in the courtyard. Mehtab Singh then gave a knife blow on the neck of Halku and Pyare pick
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.