SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 344

A.ALAGIRISWAMI, K.K.MATHEW
D. Cawasji And Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mysore – Respondent


Judgment

MATHEW, J.:- The appellants filed writ petitions before the High Court of Mysore under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a declaration that the Mysore Elementary Education Act, 1941, and the amendments to it by the Mysore Elementary Education (Amendment) Act (XII of 1955) providing for levy and collection of Education Cess on items on which Education Cess is being levied as prescribed in the schedules of the respective Acts were beyond the competence of the Mysore State Legislature and for refund of the Educational Cess paid during 1951-52 to 1965-66 on shop rentals and tree tax in respect of toddy and duty of excise in respect of arrack and special liquor. The High Court dismissed the Writ Petitions by a common judgment and these appeals are directed against that judgment.

2. The High Court of Mysore had, in D. Cawasji and Co. v. State of Mysore, (1968) 2 Mys LJ 78 struck down the provisions of the Mysore Elementary Education Act and the amendments to it on May 2, 1968. That decision was affirmed by this Court in State of Mysore v. D. Cawasji and Co., (1971) 2 SCR 799 . Before the decision of this Court, the Mysore Legislature had passed the Mysore Education Cess (Validatio




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top