SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 102

N.L.UNTWALIA, R.S.SARKARIA
Veera Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
H.R.KHANNA, K.R.CHAUDHARY, K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, M.N.SHROFF

JUDGMENT

R. S. SARKARIA, J.:—Veera Ibrahim, appellant was accused No. 2 in the complaint filed by Assistant Collector of Customs, Preventive Department Bombay before the Chief Presidency Magistrate for his prosecution along with one Abdul Umrao Rauf, accused No.1, in respect of offences under Ss. 135 (a) and 135 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 and S.5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947. The trial Magistrate convicted both the accused on all the three charges and sentenced them to two years rigorous imprisonment on each count with a direction that the sentences would run concurrently. Against that judgment, two separate appeals were filed by the convicts in the Bombay High Court which acquitted both the accused of the offences under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 and under Section 135 (b) of the Customs Act, but maintained their conviction on the charge under Section 135 (a) of that Act reducing the sentence to one year s rigorous imprisonment. The High Court, however, granted a certificate under Article 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution, on the basis of which, this appeal has been filed.

2. The main question with reference to which the certificate wa





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top