SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND P.N. SHINGHAL, JJ.
Bhagwati and others, Appellants
Versus
The State of U.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 261 of 1971
Decided on 8-4-1976.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Frank Anthony Sr. Advocate, (Mr. Janardan Sharma, Mr. V. P. Choudhary, and Mr. Jitendra Sharma Advocates of M/s. Sharma, Choudhury and Rahti, Advocates with him) for Appellant; Mr. O. P. Rana, Advocate, for Respondents.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 read with Section 34 - Executed a sale deed - Application for mutation - Possession of the land - Alleged by the prosecution was the first cousin of He married Smt. Dharamraji, but had no child - He had some agricultural land in village district but he allowed to cultivate it because of his weak health and his widow inherited his fields which however continued to be cultivated thereafter went away to as she married was the brother-in-law of appellant - She executed a sale deed land in favour ofday earlier made an application for mutation of the fields in his name on the basis of his relationship also made a similar application after execution of the sale deed in his favour and Smt. Dharamraji supported that application by filing her consent – Held, prosecution deserves to be rejected because of its failure to examine - It is true prosecution did not examine Matai alias Matadin but, as has been held by this Court it would be unsound to lay down a general rule that every witness mentioned in the first information report must be examined by the prosecution in all circumstances and that the failure to do so would lead to the rejection of the evidence of all others - Some criticism has been directed against the recoveries which were said to have been made by the Investigating Officer at the instance of appellant - High Court has not placed reliance on that part of evidence because it was satisfied that the other evidence was sufficient for the reversal of finding of acquittal. Nothing could therefore turn on the alleged recoveries - Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT
SHINGHAL, J. :—This appeal by Bhagwati, Shital and Ram Avadh, sons of Salaru, is directed against the appellate judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated December 18, 1970 setting aside their acquittal by Civil and Sessions Judge (Gonda Bahraich) of the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and sentending them to imprisonment for life for that offence.
2. It was alleged by the prosecution that one Sheo Prasad was the first cousin of Bachchu Lal (P.W. 5). He married Smt. Dharamraji, but had no child. He had some agricultural land in village Nagwa in Gonda district of Uttar Pradesh, but he allowed Bachchu Lal to cultivate it because of his weak health. Sheo Prasad died, and his widow Smt. Dharamraji inherited his fields which however continued to be cultivated by Bachchu Lal, Smt. Dharamraji thereafter went away to Basti as she married Nabbu Lal, who was the brother-in-law of appellant Bhagwati. Thereafter she executed a sale deed (Ex. Ka-29) of the land in favour of Bhagwati on May 11, 1965. A day earlier, Bachchu Lal made an application for mutation of the fields in his name on the basis of his relationship with Sheo Prasad. Bhagwati also made a similar application after execution of the sale deed in his favour and Smt. Dharamraji supported that application by filing her consent on November 15, 1965. Bachchu Lal s case was that, after her remarriage. Smt. Dharamraji forfeited her right to Sheo Prasad s fields; and it is not in dispute that the controversy was pending on the date of the alleged incident.
3. Bachchu Lal was, according to the prosecution, in possession of the land all along and was cultivating it. On July 2, 1967, half an hour after sunrise. Bachchu Lal s sons Jokhan and Munna went to Sheo Prasad s field, which was adjacent to their own field, to plough it. After they had ploughed it a little, it is alleged that appellants Bhagwati, Shital and Ram Avadh came there. Bhagwati and Ram Avadh were armed with lathis , while Shital was armed with a spear. They began to beat Jokhan and Munna, who cried for help. Lalla (P.W. 1), Sridhar (P.W. 2 and Matai alias Matadin, who were ploughing their fields nearby, rushed to the place of occurrence. They say the appellants beating both Jokhan and Munna in the field of Sheo Prasad. When Jokhan fell down. Munna ran away to the adjacent field of Molbu, but the appellants brought him to Sheo Prasad s field by dragging him by his leg and beat him again. Lalla (P.W. 1), Sridhar (P.W. 2) and Matai alias Matadin reprimanded the appellants, and they ran away towards the village. The witnesses went near Jokhan and Munna and found that they were about to die. Cots were obtained from the village and Jokhan and Munna were taken to Dhomariya Dih which was at a distance of about a mile. They were then taken in ekkas" to police station Nasirganj, which was at a distance of about seven miles from the place of occurrence. Jokhan died on the way near Jamadarpura. An oral report (Ex. Ka-1) was lodged by Lalla (P.W. 1), at the police station at 8.45 a.m. Munna was sent to Sadar Hospital, Gonda, but he also succumbed to his injuries on the way. A case was registered at the police station and it was investigated by Station House Officer Taj Bahadur Singh (P.W. 10). The dead bodies were taken to the mortuary at Gonda and were examined by Dr. J. Chandra. Appellant Bhagwati was arrested the same day, but appellant 1451 Shital was not found until July 5 and appellant Ram Avadh surrendered on July 11.
4. It was with these allegations that the appellants were committed to the Court of Session. As has been stated, they were acquitted by the Sessions Judge, but have been convicted by the High Court of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life.
5. It has been argued by Mr. Anthony on behalf of the appellants that the trial Court had correctly evaluated the evidence of Lalla (P.W. 1) and Shridhar P. W. 2 and that the High Court was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.