SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 57

H.R.KHANNA, P.K.GOSWAMI, P.S.KAILASAM
Commissioner of Income-tax, W. B. -I, now W. B. -II, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
Indian Aluminium Co. LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

GOSWAMI, J.:- This appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal, Calcutta, on certificate is from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court, since reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-I v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd., 88 ITR 257 = (1973 Tax LR 808) (Cal).

2. The facts appearing from the judgment are as follows :-

The Indian Aluminium Company Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as the respondent) was a manufacturer of aluminium ingots from ore. In the years prior to the assessement year 1960-61 in question the respondent had four manufacturing centres at Belur, Kalwa, Alupuram and Hirakud. In the accounting year relevant to the assessment year in question one more centre was established at Muri and there were also extensions to the existing factories at Belur and Alupuram. In the assessment year 1960-61 the respondent claimed relief under Section 15-C of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (briefly the Act) in respect of the fresh capital outlay at Muri as well as of the additional investments in the form of extensions to the existing factory premises, installation of new plant and machinery etc. at Belur and Alupuram. The Income-tax Officer refused to allow






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top