SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, R.S. SARKARIA AND S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JJ.
The Sales Tax Officer XI. Enforcement Branch, Greater Bombay, Appellant
Versus
V. Poonnamal and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 594 of 1972,
D/- 9-2-1977.
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 – Section 33 - Sales-tax - Pre-dissolution transactions - Only question which arises for determination in this appeal by certificate is whether a dissolved firm can be assessed to sales-tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions - Respondents were at all material times partners in a firm called Textiles - This firm commenced business and was dissolved - Appellant who is Sales Tax Officer XI. Enforcement Branch, issued a notice to the dissolved firm under S. 33 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 in respect of the period - Respondents thereupon preferred a Writ Petition in High Court of Madras challenging the validity of the notice on ground inter alia that since firm was dissolved it was not competent to appellant to initiate any proceedings for assessment of the firm – Held, question whether a dissolved firm can be assessed to sales-tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 came up for consideration before this Court in Murarilal Mahabir Prasad v. Shri B. R. Vad, (1976) 1 SCR 689 - This Court by a majority held in that case that the Scheme of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and particularly Ss. 18 and 19(3) clearly show that, notwithstanding the dissolution of a firm, it can be assessed to sales tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions - In view of this decision, the question no longer survives for consideration and we must hold that the appellant was entitled to initiate proceedings for assessment of the firm of Textiles by issuing Notice under S. 33 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959 - Court accordingly allow the appeal, set aside the judgment of High Court and dismiss the Writ Petition - Appeal allowed.
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J. - The only question which arises for determination in this appeal by certificate is whether a dissolved firm can be assessed to sales-tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions. The respondents were at all material times partners in a firm called M/s. Ardhanari Textiles. This firm commenced business in the year 1959 and was dissolved on 9th June, 1965. The appellant who is the Sales Tax Officer XI. Enforcement Branch, Bombay, issued a notice dated 4th March, 1966 to the dissolved firm under S. 33 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 in respect of the period 1st January 1960 upto 30th September, 1965. The respondents thereupon preferred a Writ Petition in the High Court of Madras challenging the validity of the notice on the ground inter alia that since the firm was dissolved it was not competent to the appellant to initiate any proceedings for assessment of the firm. The Writ Petition was allowed by the High Court, relving on an earlier decision given by it in L. V. Veeri Chettiar v. Sales Tax Officer Bombay, (1970) 26 STC 579. The High Court took the view that once a firm was dissolved, there was no provision in the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959 for assessing the dissolved firm to sales tax in respect of its perior transactions. The appellant thereupon preferred the present appeal after obtaining a certificate of fitness from the High Court.
2. The question whether a dissolved firm can be assessed to sales-tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 came up for consideration before this Court in Murarilal Mahabir Prasad v. Shri B. R. Vad, (1976) 1 SCR 689. This Court by a majority held in that case that the Scheme of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and particularly Ss. 18 and 19(3) clearly show that, notwithstanding the dissolution of a firm, it can be assessed to sales tax in respect of its pre-dissolution transactions. In view of this decision, the question no longer survives for consideration and we must hold that the appellant was entitled to initiate proceedings for assessment of the firm of M/s. Ardhanari Textiles by issuing Notice dated 4th March, 1966 under S. 33 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959.
3. We accordingly allow the appeal, set aside the judgment of the High Court and dismiss the Writ Petition. There will be no order as to costs.
Appeal allowed.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1360
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.