SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 452

V.R.KRISHNA IYER, H.R.KHANNA
Sales Tax Officer, Sector I, Kanpur – Appellant
Versus
Dwarika Prasad Sheo Karan Dass – Respondent


Advocates:
J.RAMAMURTHY, O.P.RANA, S.C.Manchanda

Judgment

KHANNA, J.:- This appeal on certificate is against the judgment of Allahabad High Court whereby the High Court accepted petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the respondent and quashed the recovery proceedings initiated by the appellant.

2. The respondent-firm was assessed to sales tax under the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the assessment year 1958-59. The respondent went up in appeal and the tax demand was reduced in appeal. On revision filed by the respondent the total demand of sales tax was further reduced. The respondent made various payments towards the amount of tax found due from him. The sales tax authorities initiated proceedings for recovering the balance of the tax and realising interest at the rate of 18 per cent from February 1, 1964 on part of the tax demand. These recovery proceedings were challenged by the respondent by means of writ petition on the ground that a fresh notice of demand should have been issued to him in respect of the amount as reduced in appeal and revision. Unless that was done, the respondent could not be treated as a defaulter. The liability for payment of interest of the re




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top