SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 427

H.R.KHANNA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
V. Gurliviah Naidu And Sons – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, A.V.RANGAM, I.SUBRAMANIAM, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.SRINIVAS MURTHY, S.GOPALAKRISHNA IYER

Judgment

KHANNA, J.:- These appeals by special leave are against the judgment of Madras High Court whereby that Court repelled the challenge to the validity of Items 7 (a) and 7 (b) of the Second Schedule to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the State Act).

2. The appellants are dealers in hides and skins. The appellants purchase raw hides and skins locally as well as in the course of inter-State trade and commerce. The raw hides and skins are converted into dressed hides and skins and are sold either locally or in the course of export. The matter relates to the assessment year 1968-69 and the dispute between the parties arises because of the inclusion in the turnover of the sale and purchase price of some of the above goods. The appellants by means of writ petitions challenged the validity of Items 7 (A) and 7 (b) of the Second Schedule to the State Act. The High Court, as already mentioned, repelled the attack on the validity of those items and dismissed the writ petitions.

Before dealing with the contentions advanced, it may be appropriate to refer to the relevant provisions. Section 4 of the State Act is the charging section in respect of declared































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top