SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 12

H.R.KHANNA, P.K.GOSWAMI, P.S.KAILASAM
Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes – Appellant
Versus
H. R. Sri Ramulu – Respondent


Advocates:
MARAYAN NETTER, R.M.MEHTA

Judgment

KHANNA, J. :- These two appeals by special leave are against the common judgment of the Mysore High Court whereby the High Court in two petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India quashed two orders made by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes appellant under Section 21 of the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The respondent is an excise contractor. He was assessed under the Act for the assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61 as per orders dated March 21, 1963 made by the Commercial Tax Officer Raichur. Under those orders the taxable turnover of the respondent for the two years in question was determined after deducting the shop rent and the trees tax. For the assessment year 1959-60, a sum of Rs. 2,10,542 was deducted and the net taxable turnover was determined to be Rs. 25,989. For the year 1960-61 a sum of Rs. 3,99,350 was deducted and the net taxable turnover was determined to be Rs. 26,657.

3. The Commercial Tax Officer initiated proceedings under Section 12-A of the Act in respect of the aforesaid years because he was of the view that some items of turnover had escaped assessment. As per orders dated June 8, 1966 he made a




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top