SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 328

A.D.KOSHAL, V.R.KRISHNA IYER, D.A.DESAI
Ramavarmabharathanthampuram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.NAMBIYAR, N.Sadhakaran

Judgment

KRSHNA IYER, J.:- All the parties are represented by counsel and we have heard them in extenso. We therefore proceed to pass a speaking order.

2. The princely family of Cochin with a proletarian plurality of members has been the cynosure of special legislations, the last of which is Act 15 of 1978, the target of attack in this special leave petition. Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution have been the ammunition used by the petitioner in the High Court and here to shoot down the legislation as ultra vires.

2-A. A brief sketch of the family law of the Cochin royalty may serve to appreciate the schemes of the latest legislation under challenge. The Maharaja of Cochin, reigned and ruled over a pretty princely State, Cochin, which is now an integral part of the Kerala State. When the curtain of history rose to find India free, the constellation of princedoms fused into Independent Indias democratic geography. Cochin and Travancore finally fell in with this trend. As a first step they were integrated into the Travancore Cochin State which came into being on July 1, 1949. Two days before this constitutional merger, the Maharaja of Cochin issued a Proclamation to provide for the im


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top