SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(SC) 39

N. CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, M. C. MAHAJAN, H. J. KANIA
Maharashtra Sugar Mills LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bombay – Respondent


Advocates:
G.N.Joshi, M.C.SETALVAD, N.C.CHATTERJI, P.A.Mehta, RAJINDAR NARAIN, RAMESHWAR NATH ROY

Judgment

Mahajan J. - The appellants are a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, & have got mills at Tilaknagar, District Ahmednagar, in the State of Bombay, for manufacturing sugar. For the purpose of their business, they employ muster labour & contract labour.

2. By a notification dated 8-1-1948, published in the Govt. Gazette, under S:2 (4), Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (Bombay Act XI [11] of 1947), the Provincial Govt. applied the provisions of the Act to sugar industry with effect from 12-1-1948. A dispute arose between the employees of the appellants including the seasonal & contract labour & the appellants as regards the demand made by the employees for payment of six months wages as bonus for the year 1947-48 & as the dispute was not resolved by conciliation, the Govt. of Bombay issued the following notification on 1- 4-1949: " Whereas an industrial dispute has arisen between the Maharashtra Sugar Mills Ltd., Belapur Road, District Ahmednagar & its employees (hereinafter referred to as the said industrial dispute ) in respect of payment of six months wages as bonus for the year 1947-48 to all employees including the seasonal & contract labour; And wh










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top