SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 86

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.S.PATHAK
Deputy Commissioner Of Sales Tax (Law) Board Of Revenue (Taxes) , Ernakulam – Appellant
Versus
Kaycee Plantations And Cannings, Trichur – Respondent


Judgment

PATHAK, J.:- In all these appeals, the question raised is whether when pineapple fruit is processed into pineapple slices for the purpose of being sold in sealed cans, it can be said that the original pineapple fruit is consumed for the purpose of manufacture and, therefore, the case falls under S. 5-A (1) (a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. This question has been considered by this Court in Dy. Commr., Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam v. Pio Food Packers (AIR 1980 SC 1227) and has been answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. It is not disputed that the judgment of this Court fully applies to the appeals before us. In the circumstances, the appeals fail and are dismissed. But there is no order as to costs.

Appeals dismissed.

For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 976

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top