SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 303

A.D.KOSHAL, BAHARUL ISLAM
Gokul Parashram Patil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
A.B.LAL, O.P.RANA, R.N.Poddar, V.D.KHANNA, V.N.GANPULE

Judgment

A. D. KOSHAL, J.:- Special Leave granted.

The appellant has been convicted of an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for causing the death of one Anta, and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life by the trial court as well as in appeal by the High Court.

2. The case of the prosecution was that the appellant attacked the deceased with a knife giving the latter a single blow above the left clavicle where it caused a muscle-deep incised wound having the dimensions 1 1/4"X1/3". The autopsy surgeon, while certifying the existence of that wound, also found that the superior venacava had been cut, the damage so caused being sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the case does not fall within the ambit of Section 302 of the Code and that the two courts below erred in relying on Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 SC 465. The gist of the dictum of this court in that case is that if an injury is held to have been intended by the assailant and is further found to be sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, it would attract claus









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top