SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 247

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, A.P. SEN AND E. S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras, Appellant
Versus
Andhra Chambers of Commerce etc., Respondents.
Civil Appeal No.222 of 1980, D/-2-5-1980.

Headnote:

Income-tax Act 1961 - Section 2 (15) and 11 (1) - Promote Trade and Commerce - Activity for Profit - Appeal by special leave is covered by judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce and in Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association - It is clear from judgment in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce that objects of Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within last head of charitable purpose denoted by words "advancement of any other object of general public utility" and were, therefore, charitable within meaning of Sec. 2 (15) of Income-tax Act 1961 unless it could be shown that they involved carrying on of any activity for profit – Held, Words "not involving carrying on of any activity for profit" came up for consideration before this Court in Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association and there it was held by majority Judges that it was only where predominant object and purpose of activity carried on was to earn profit, that object could be said to involve carrying on of an activity for profit but if predominant object was to subserve charitable purpose then inhibition of these last 9 words would not be attracted - It is clear from facts set out in judgment of High Court that profit making was not predominant object of activity carried on by Andhra Chamber of Commerce but predominant object was to promote trade and commerce which was an object of general public utility - High Court was, therefore, right in taking view that objects of Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within last category of charitable purpose given in Sec. 2 (15) of Act and its income was exempt from tax under Section 11 (1) of Act - Appeal dismissed.

Judgment

JUDGMENT:- This appeal by special leave is covered by the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce (55 ITR 722) and in Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association (121 ITR 1) : (AIR 1980 SC 387). It is clear from the judgment in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce (supra) that the objects of the Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within the last head of charitable purpose denoted by the words "advancement of any other object of general public utility" and were, therefore, charitable within the meaning of Sec. 2 (15) of the Income-tax Act 1961 unless it could be shown that they involved the carrying on of any activity for profit. The words "not involving carrying on of any activity for profit" came up for consideration before this Court in Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association (supra) and there it was held by the majority Judges that it was only where the predominant object and purpose of the activity carried on was to earn profit, that the object could be said to involve the carrying on of an activity for profit but if the predominant object was to subserve the charitable purpose then the inhibition of these last 9 words would not be attracted. It is clear from the facts set out in the judgment of the High Court that profit making was not the predominant object of the activity carried on by the Andhra Chamber of Commerce but the predominant object was to promote trade and commerce which was an object of general public utility. The High Court was, therefore, right in taking the view that the objects of the Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within the last category of charitable purpose given in Sec. 2 (15) of the Act and its income was exempt from tax under Section 11 (1) of the Act.

2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

3. S.L.P. (Civil) No. 4165/79,S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 4166-71/79, S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 4172-75/79 and S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 3779/79 are also dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 1766

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top