SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 85

D.A.DESAI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
D. D. Joshi – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBASHINI, Indra Sawhney, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, N.C.TALUKDAR, V.B.SAHARYA

Judgment

DESAI, J.:- Commissioned Officers belonging to Army Medical Corps (AMC for short), having post-graduate qualifications in different specialities at the time of obtaining commission have approached this Court under Article 32 complaining of a discriminatory treatment in the matter of granting ante-dating benefit which is directly linked to seniority and promotional prospects.

2. Petitioners in the first batch of petitions were granted commission in AMC between 1954 and 1963. Petitioner in the second petition was commissioned as a regular officer in AMC on March 15, 1970. There are in all 154 commissioned officers including the petitioners belonging to AMC who are similarly situated and who according to the petitioners suffered the same discriminatory treatment. The petition is not in a representative capacity. Petitioners assert that the decision in his group of petitions would affect roughly 147 other officers.

3. Petitioners held post-graduate qualifications in different branches of medical science and some of them held an approved wholetime appointment in a recognised civil hospital for a period of six months or more prior to their being commissioned in AMC.

4. There is a pr





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top