SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 235

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.B.MISRA
G. S. Agarwal: Sabajmala Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:- Each of the petitioners in the above two petitions is liable to pay certain dues to the U. P. State Electricity Board. In order to recover the said dues action was taken against them under the U. P. Government Electrical Undertakings (Dues Recovery) Act, 1958 read with Section 279 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Apprehending that the revenue authorities concerned would proceed against them to recover the said dues by their arrest and detention under Section 279 (1) (b) read with Section 281 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 the petitioners have filed the above petitions challenging inter alia the constitutional validity of the process of arrest and detention prescribed by Section 279 (1) (b) of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. In Ram Narayan Agarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh. Writ Petitions Nos. 1110 of 1980 etc. etc, decided today: (reported in 1983 Tax LR 3008) (SC) we have upheld the constitutional validity of the said provisions. The only point pressed before us in these two petitions being the one relating to the validity of the above provisions, we dismiss the above two


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top