M.P.THAKKAR, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Madhusudan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. M. FAZAL ALI, J. — True to the spirit and letter of our Constitution and in fulfilment of the promises made by our national leaders to the people of India, the Government sought to introduce agrarian reforms so as to reserve the lands to the tillers of the soil giving marginal relief or compensation to the erstwhile landlords or tenants-in-chief, through various statutes passed by almost all the States in the country. In order to hasten and safeguard the agrarian reforms the Constitution takes full care by virtue of the insertion of the directive principles of State policy contained in Part IV, which are undoubtedly the heart and soul of our Constitution and have in fact been complied with in a variety of spheres. Ceaseless attempts made by the landlords to challenge the constitutional validity of the aforesaid reforms met with little success. Having failed in their attempts to undo the socialist reforms passed for the purpose of building an egalitarian society and bringing about marked improvement in the condition of the poor suffering tillers by the various Acts passed by the States, the landlords left no stone unturned and were always on the lookout for an opportunit
State of T.N. v. L. Abu Kavur Bai
State of Karnataka v. Ranganatha Reddy
followed : Sasanka Sekhar Maity v. Union of India
relied on : Sri Sri Kalimata Thakurani v. Union of India
explained : Sri Sri Kalimata Thakurani v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.