SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, AMARENDRA NATH SEN AND RANGANATH MISRA, JJ.
H. V. Pardasani, etc., Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 10618-10628 of 1983, D/- 12-3-1985.
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 32, 14, 16 - Rule 12, 13(5), 10, 13(4), (5), 18(3)(c), 2(oo),(b) 12, 12(4), 12(5), 18 - Promotees - Seniority - Length of Service - Petitioners in these applications belong to cadre of Section Officers in Central Secretariat Service - They challenge combined seniority list of all Section Officers belonging to service and have asked for a direction that select list in Grade I of Service be recast - They have also asked for a further direction that some of direct recruits included in eligibility list of Section Officers shown in Annexure PI should be omitted from it and a direction should issue from Court to appoint promotees to Grade I with effect from date on which junior directly recruited Section Officers have been appointed to Grade I - They have further assailed vires of note below Rule 12. R. 13(5) and Regulation 3(3) of Fourth Schedule as being ultra vires - According to petitioners seniority between direct recruits and promotees in grade of Section Officers has to be fixed, on basis of length of service in the grade and not by process envisaged under Rules and relevant Regulations - Whether Articles 14 and/or 16 of Constitution are violated would not be appropriate – Held, Delay and laches were advanced as contentions on behalf of Central Government for rejecting petitions – Court do not think it is necessary to go into that question as court have already taken that into Consideration while dealing with other contentions - It is, however, relevant to point out that of 11 petitioners as many as 9 had got into cadre of Assistants as direct recruits and they had themselves got advantage over promotees who had put in a longer period of service in such cadre - They should not now grudge a similar advantage being obtained by some other direct recruits in higher cadre - After all as court have already said in a case of this type a broader perspective has to be maintained and examination cannot be permitted to be as strict as petitioners have asked us to adopt - In view of what court have said, each of these petitions must be dismissed but court think it appropriate to suggest to Central Government to streamline scheme by a review of Rules and Regulations so that rancour and heart-burning in officers may he reduced to inevitable minimum in matter of implementation - Petitions dismissed.
Judgment
RANGANATH MISRA, J.:- Petitioners in these applications under Art. 32 of the Constitution belong to the cadre of Section Officers in the Central Secretariat Service (Service for short). They challenge the combined seniority list of all the Section Officers belonging to the service and have asked for a direction that the select list in Grade I of the Service be recast. They have also asked for a further direction that some of the direct recruits included in the eligibility list of Section Officers shown in Annexure PI should be omitted from it and a direction should issue from the Court to appoint promotees to Grade I with effect from the date on which junior directly recruited Section Officers have been appointed to Grade I. They have further assailed the vires of the note below Rule 12. R. 13(5) and Regulation 3(3) of the Fourth Schedule as being ultra vires Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. According to the petitioners the seniority between the direct recruits and promotees in the grade of Section Officers has to be fixed, on the basis of length of service in the grade and not by the process envisaged under the Rules and the relevant Regulations.
2. The respondents have taken the stand that the provision for fixing seniority has been made by the statutory Rules and the combined seniority list as also the eligibility list are in accordance with the statutory scheme.
3. These applications were heard along with a batch of other writ petitions filed by Assistants belonging to the Service the judgment whereof is being simultaneously delivered.
4. It is appropriate that we refer to the provisions of the relevant Rules and Regulations before we proceed to examine the submissions. The composition of the Service is covered by Rule 3 which provides for four grades being :-
(i) Selection Grade (Deputy Secretary to the Government of India or equivalent) :
(ii) Grade I (Under-Secretary to the Government of India or equivalent)
(iii) Section Officers grade :
(iv) Assistants grade.
The first two grades have been combinedly classified as Central Civil Service Grade A while the other two have similarly been classified together as Central Civil Service Group B - Ministerial. In this bunch of writ applications we are concerned with the claim of Section Officers belonging to the third grade in the classification seeking promotion to in the Grade I which is covered by the second Grade. Rule 12 makes provision for recruitment to the Selection Grade as also Grade I. Sub-rule (2) thereof provides : "Vacancies in Grade I shall be filled by, promotion of permanent officers of the Section, Officers Grade who have rendered not less than eight years approved service in that Grade and of permanent officers of the Grade A of the Central Secretariat Stenographers Service who have rendered not less than eight years approved service in that Grade and have worked as Section Officers for at least a period of two years in accordance with the proviso to Rule 10 and are included in the Select List for Grade I of the Service prepared under sub-rule (4)." There are four provisos to this sub-rule. The second and third provisos which are relevant are to the following effect :
"Provided further that no person included in a later Select list shall be eligible to be appointed to the Grade until all officers included in an earlier Select List have been appointed.
Provided further that if any person appointed to the Section Officers grade is considered for promotion to Grade I under this sub-rule, all persons senior to him in Section Officers Grade who have rendered not less than six years approved service in that Grade, shall also be considered notwithstanding that they may not have rendered eight years approved service in that Grade; provided that the aforesaid condition of six years approved ,service shall not apply to a person belonging to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes."
Sub-rule (4) provides that for the purposes of sub-rules (1) and (2) a Select Li
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.