SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(SC) 372

V.D.TULZAPURKAR, R.S.PATHAK
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Macneill And Barry LTD. , Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K.PURI, M.N.TANDON, R.A.GUPTA, RANDHIR CHAWLA, S.C.Manchanda, S.T.DESAI, Ujjal Singh

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, J.:— The short question in this appeal by special leave is whether ammonia paper and ferro paper can be described as "paper other than hand made paper" for the purposes of the notification No. ST-3124/X1012(4)-1965 dated July 1, 1966 issued under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948.

2. The respondent assessee is a dealer in stationery and drawing material, and sells ammonia paper and ferro paper. In assessment proceedings under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 for the assessment year 1966-67 the assessee claimed that ammonia paper and ferro paper were liable to tax as unclassified goods at the rate of two per cent prescribed by S. 3 of the Act. The claim was not accepted by the Sales Tax Officer who held that ammonia paper and ferro paper fell under the entry "paper other than hand made paper" included in notification No. ST-3124/X-1012(4) - 1965 dated July 1, 1966 and its turnover was, therefore, liable to tax at six per cent. Against the assessment so made the assessee appealed, but his appeal was dismissed by the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax. A revision petition by the assessee thereafter was dismissed by the Revising Authority. At the instance of the assess











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top