SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 258

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, RANGANATH MISRA
Indu Bhusan De – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.M.BAGARIA, B.P.MAHESHVARI, D.N.MUKHERJI, G.S.CHATTERJEE, S.N.Agarwal

JUDGMENT

RANGANATH MISRA, J.:— This appeal by certificate from the Calcutta High Court assails the affirming judgment of the Division Bench upholding the dismissal of a writ petition challenging the vires of the Calcutta City Civil Court Act (21 of 1953) and its later amendment on the ground of want of legislative competence of the State Legislature. The City Civil Court Act (Act for short), empowered the State Government to establish a Civil Court to be called the City Civil Court and under S. 5 thereof the local limits and the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court was to be the city of Calcutta. Sub-sec. (2) of S. 3 provided :

"Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4), the City Civil Court shall have jurisdiction and the High Court shall not have jurisdiction to try suits and proceedings of a civil nature not exceeding Rs. 10,000/- in value."

The value of Rs. 10,000/- was later enhanced to Rs. 50,000/- and again to Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant moved the Calcutta High Court for a declaration that the Act was ultra vires the State Legislature. It was contended that Parliament alone had the legislative competence to make law affecting the jurisdiction of the High Court. The l
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top