SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 421

P. N. BHAGWATI, RANGANATH MISRA
Ranga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Special leave granted.

2. We are of the view that the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal ought not to have determined the question of seniority without the appellants in both the appeals being before the Tribunal since the determination of this question would directly affect the interest of the appellants. We would, therefore, allow the appeals, set aside the order made by the Tribunal on September 3, 1984 and the subsequent direction given by the High Court for its implementation and remand the matter to the Tribunal with a direction that the appellants shall be joined as party respondents to the representation before the Tribunal and the representation shall be heard and disposed of by the Tribunal after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the parties including the appellants in both the appeals.

3. Since the order of the Tribunal as also the subsequent direction given by the High Court for its implementation are being set aside by us, any consequential action taken by the State Government will also have to be set aside but it will be open to any party including the appellants to make an application for interim relief to the Tribunal, y if so advised and if such app




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top